Philosophy has to Provide a Fake World View
来源:Duan Y., "Philosophy Has to Provide a Fake World View". WOP in Education Social Sciences and Psycholopy, Volume:93 (November 29-30, 2022), pp.175-179. | 作者:段勇 | 发布时间: 2023-03-23 | 7455 次浏览 | 分享到:
Abstract
Everyone thinks that only the scientific world view is correct, but the discussion of this paper will prove that the value of this kind of world view is very limited. We need a fake but more valuable metaphysical world view. In the world view of science and Materialism, it can be said that there is only matter, with no place for human and consciousness, all human culture and civilization are smaller than dust. The metaphysical world view should completely change this picture, making thought products like concepts and theories bigger than the objective world. The subjective world and the objective world should form a mutually inclusive dialectical unity relationship. The world view of philosophy is the world view of value, but not the real world view. The contents on the architectural drawings are fake and non-existent in the begining, but very important. Objective things can not directly affect people's decision-making. The philosophical world view should describe the world that affects decision-making. Abstract laws and generalities exist only in the mind. Compared with a specific conclusion, the abstract major premise has greater value. Philosophical world view should be the logical starting point, the biggest premise, of all theoretical deduction. The pyramid of theory is built to know why.
Key Words: Ontology; World view; Metaphysics; Decision-making; Hegel

    The metaphysical worldview should completely change this picture, making thought products like concepts and theories bigger than the objective world. The subjective world and the objective world should form a mutually inclusive dialectical unity relationship.[2] This is the first reason why philosophy provides a fake world view. Because the value standard is the final standard of decision making, all theories should serve for decision making, so the philosophical worldview is the worldview that reflects value, but not the real world. The Origin and Noumenon that philosophical ontology studies is of the worldview that reflects value. 

    The purpose of studying philosophy is to serve people, to serve the continuous development and evolution of civilization and culture. What is the value of Materialism if it does not serve people? It's like that if a boss hires someone, who doesn't work for the boss but works for the competitor all day, can the boss still hire him? So no matter whether Materialism is objective or not, it is not the most valuable worldview. Of course, the objective and real worldview is not completely worthless, but it is far from satisfying people's needs. The vast universe is of little value to human beings. What is the most valuable to human beings is our daily life, our interests and needs, the culture and civilization we create.

    Before we can build a building, we have to design it and draw complete engineering drawings. The completed building is a real objective existence. Before the building is built, the building is not existent. But this non-existent building exists in the designer's mind with wealth of contents, including its various parts of the structural dimensions, the materials used, strength requirements, fire protection arrangement and many other things. None of these contents has been realized in the real building, all of them are fake and non-existent contents, all of them are the product of consciousness and thought in the human mind. But the non-existent contents are very important, and without the fake contents there would be no real building.

    All human engineering constructions have such a process, consciousness first, material second. Man first creates some fake non-existent things in consciousness, and then creates a real objective existence in reality. These fake consciousness and thought products are the core contents of human civilization and culture. Whether human civilization is developed is first reflected in these non-existent fake contents.

3.The Objective World cannot Influence Decision Making

    Each person can only make decisions and act according to his own subjective world. The world outside the subjective world can influence the effect of his behavior, but does not affect his behavioral decisions. For example, there was a stone in front of me. I didn't see it, so I kept walking and tripped and fell flat on my face. Next time I walk here, I'll try to walk around it or over it. This stone is outside my consciousness, and whether I see it or not, it will affect my practical effect and trip me up. But this stone doesn't affect my decision making. When I didn't see it, I went straight ahead. But the second time I came here, my decision changed. What changed my decision? Not the stone of the objective world, but the stone of the subjective world in my mind. Because when I saw the stone, I added a stone to my subjective world. The stone was a logical structure that I have created in my head, the result of a thought game in my head that can influence my decision.