Objective Idealism has been looking for these essences, sticking to the original goal, so Objective Idealism has been doing the right thing. Although Objective Idealism has serious faults, it cannot be denied that it is doing the right thing, that is, doing something of great value.

Anti-essentialism, Subjective Idealism and Materialism pointed out the faults of Objective Idealism, but failed to see the advantages of Objective Idealism, not seeing the Origin is not general consciousness, but only the most abstract consciousness of regularity. So Descartes and Hume failed to knock down Objective Idealism, but it was later carried forward by Hegel. The Anti-essentialists had just been finding faults with Objective Idealism instead of doing the right thing. Philosophical theories need to be constantly overthrown and renewed, but Anti-essentialism only overthrew without renewing anything. To overthrow and renew is to establish new Essentialism while opposing old Essentialism.

Reference

[1] Duan Y., "The World View of Dialectical Dualist: The Dialectical Relation View of the Subjective World and the Objective World," in International Journal of Philosophy. Vol. 9, No. 2, 2021, pp.78-84.

[2] Zheng H.S., Major Schools of Modern Western Philosophy (In Chinese). Beijing: China Renmin University Press, 1988:344

[3] I.Kant. Critique of Pure Reason (In Chinese). Translated by Deng X.M. Beijing: Renmin Press,2017, 2nd Edition:11.

[4] Duan Y., Taijievolutionism Second Part. Hong Kong: Siji Publishing House, 2017:208.

[5] Hegel. Small Logic (In Chinese). Beijing: The Commercial Press,1980, 2nd edition :246.