The Dialectical Unity of Subjective and Objective Worlds: Understanding their Interdependent Relationship through Daily Activities
来源:Lecture Notes in Economics, Management and Social Science, Part A, Vol.57 (February 27-28, 2023), pp.57-62. | 作者:Yong Duan | 发布时间: 2023-05-10 | 6812 次浏览 | 分享到:
Abstract: Every day we play games of thought, such as prediction, decision, guess and understanding. These games are indispensable in human production and life, as well as the main content of human civilization and culture. For each of these things, the objective world is a part of the subjective world. This philosophical worldview is a fake but more valuable worldview. This paper analyzes the thought games of decision, prediction, desire, guess, understanding, evaluation, art and religion respectively. Many alternative plans made before decision belong to the subjective world, and one of them will become objective reality. This plan belongs to the objective world, so the objective world is a part of the subjective world. A plan is a systematic decision making over a period of time. Laws, institutions, rules, standards, etc., are systematic decisions for a number of years or all time. In the objective world, there is only the present, without the past and the future. In the subjective world, there can be the past, the present and the future at the same time, so the objective world is a part of the subjective world. This paper also analyzes the conditions for the use of Robert's Rules of procedure.
Key Words: Ontology; World View; Objective World; Subjective World

The first and the third proposals, although not ultimately adopted, also had a possibility before decision-making. If the probability of the first one is 30%, then there was 30% objectivity. Not adopted means that it was 100% subjective. Thirty percent is a part of the 100%, and in this sense, it can also be said that objectivity is a part of the subjectivity, and the objective world is a part of the subjective world. The second scheme also had the possibility of being rejected before it was adopted, that is, there was some subjectivity in the second scheme. Its ultimate adoption meant that its objectivity was 100%. In this sense, it can be said that subjectivity is a part of objectivity, and the subjective world is a part of the objective world. The subjective world and the objective world are mutually inclusive as dialectical unity. 

From the scientific world view, the objective world is not a part of the subjective world, but the philosophical world view should recognize that the objective world and the subjective world are mutually inclusive dialectical unity. This philosophical worldview is a fake but more valuable worldview.

Another example is where to eat at noon today. I have two ideas, one is to eat at home, the other is to eat in a restaurant. There are variety of ideas and plans, from daily chores to company decisions and national policies. For all ideas and schemes, the objective world is a part of the subjective world.

If a plan determines the work content of ten days, each day's work content can be said a decision, ten days' work content constitutes a decision system. So planning is a systematic decision of a certain period of time. Laws, institutions, rules, standards, etc., are systematic decisions that are generally implemented from the date of their publication and remain in force for a number of years or for all time in the future. So laws, institutions, rules, standards, etc. are systematic decisions for a number of years or all time. 

Most decisions have multiple options in the process of formulation. Decisions may be modified after a period of time, and alternative offers need to be proposed before they are modified. For all programmes, the objective world is a part of the subjective world. Standards and plans are laws or institutions in a broad sense. Standards are mainly laws in the technical field. Plans are time-specific laws, laws are plans applicable to long time or all times.