Everyone thinks that only the scientific world view is correct, but the discussion of this paper will prove that the value of this kind of world view is very limited. We need a fake but more valuable metaphysical world view. In the world view of science and Materialism, it can be said that there is only matter, with no place for human and consciousness, all human culture and civilization are smaller than dust. The metaphysical world view should completely change this picture, making thought products like concepts and theories bigger than the objective world. The subjective world and the objective world should form a mutually inclusive dialectical unity relationship. The world view of philosophy is the world view of value, but not the real world view. The contents on the architectural drawings are fake and non-existent in the begining, but very important. Objective things can not directly affect people's decision-making. The philosophical world view should describe the world that affects decision-making. Abstract laws and generalities exist only in the mind. Compared with a specific conclusion, the abstract major premise has greater value. Philosophical world view should be the logical starting point, the biggest premise, of all theoretical deduction. The pyramid of theory is built to know why.
Key Words: Ontology; World view; Metaphysics; Decision-making; Hegel
2.Human has no Place in the Objective World
The physical worldview tells us that the universe is vast and that the earth is just a grain of dust in it. Compared with the earth, man is a grain of dust. The universe is said to have been born 15 billion years ago, while the history of human being is only a few million years, and the life span of an individual is only a few decades. The great cause of mankind is even a spark that can not be seen in the universe, the prosperity of the society is a pile of loess in the end.
In this way, man has absolutely no place in the objective world. If the subjective world is a true subset of the objective world, then the true subset is too small to be anything at all. Materialist worldview is the physical worldview. Materialism regards material as the Origin and considers consciousness as not the Origin. Therefore, in the materialist worldview, it can be said that there is only matter, there is no status of man, there is no status of consciousness, and all human culture and civilization are smaller than dust.
The metaphysical worldview should completely change this picture, making thought products like concepts and theories bigger than the objective world. The subjective world and the objective world should form a mutually inclusive dialectical unity relationship.[2] This is the first reason why philosophy provides a fake world view. Because the value standard is the final standard of decision making, all theories should serve for decision making, so the philosophical worldview is the worldview that reflects value, but not the real world. The Origin and Noumenon that philosophical ontology studies is of the worldview that reflects value.
The purpose of studying philosophy is to serve people, to serve the continuous development and evolution of civilization and culture. What is the value of Materialism if it does not serve people? It's like that if a boss hires someone, who doesn't work for the boss but works for the competitor all day, can the boss still hire him? So no matter whether Materialism is objective or not, it is not the most valuable worldview. Of course, the objective and real worldview is not completely worthless, but it is far from satisfying people's needs. The vast universe is of little value to human beings. What is the most valuable to human beings is our daily life, our interests and needs, the culture and civilization we create.