Everyone thinks that only the scientific world view is correct, but the discussion of this paper will prove that the value of this kind of world view is very limited. We need a fake but more valuable metaphysical world view. In the world view of science and Materialism, it can be said that there is only matter, with no place for human and consciousness, all human culture and civilization are smaller than dust. The metaphysical world view should completely change this picture, making thought products like concepts and theories bigger than the objective world. The subjective world and the objective world should form a mutually inclusive dialectical unity relationship. The world view of philosophy is the world view of value, but not the real world view. The contents on the architectural drawings are fake and non-existent in the begining, but very important. Objective things can not directly affect people's decision-making. The philosophical world view should describe the world that affects decision-making. Abstract laws and generalities exist only in the mind. Compared with a specific conclusion, the abstract major premise has greater value. Philosophical world view should be the logical starting point, the biggest premise, of all theoretical deduction. The pyramid of theory is built to know why.
Key Words: Ontology; World view; Metaphysics; Decision-making; Hegel
Karl Marx said, "It is not consciousness that determines life, but life that determines consciousness.[3] But when people and dinosaurs faced the same objective environment, they would have different practices. People can change the world, but dinosaurs cannot. The fundamental reason for this difference is that when faced with the same objective environment, humans and dinosaurs would have different consciousness and would make different decisions. The root cause is the Origin. Decision making is the root cause of practice difference. Decision making is a kind of consciousness, not a matter, and only other consciousness in mind can affect it.
Materialists always say that objective environmental conditions determine human behavior, but they do not know that objective environmental conditions can not directly affect human decision making. If objective environmental conditions could directly influence a person's decision making, he would not make mistakes. Why do Materialists often make mistakes? Clearly the Kuomintang had laid traps on the side of the Xiangjiang River, but Red Army still slowly went forward with a lot of baggage. Objective environmental conditions did not change the decision of Li De, the commander of Red Army. Why did Mao Zedong and Li De make different decisions? It was not because the objective environmental conditions were different, but the ideas in their minds were different. They were playing different thought games in their heads, so they made completely different logical structures, and they made different decisions based on those logical structures.
There is a song called "Wake up", and there is a line in it: "How far is it from heart to heart, it is between heaven and earth." The difference between the thoughts of Li De and Mao Zedong is not general, but extremely different, which will lead to two different China. Different ideas lead to different practices, and different practices create different worlds.
The Materialist world view seems objective and true, but in fact completely contradicts the viewpoint of practice. Both decision making and objective conditions are the root causes of practice differences, so they are equal from the viewpoint of practice. But in the Materialist world view consciousness and matter are not equal. In the world view of Dialectical Dualism, matter and consciousness are equal. This world view may seem fake, but it is the only world view that can be consistent with the practical viewpoint. This world outlook does not eliminate the value of material, people should take the initiative to increase various experiences in consciousness through practice, so that consciousness becomes objective as much as possible.