Artificial Intelligence
来源:COLLECTIONS OF TAIJIEVOLUTIONISM | 作者:YONG DUAN | 发布时间: 2021-11-06 | 5357 次浏览 | 分享到:

AI will reach trillions of trillions of times of human intel- ligence.

It is said that the inventor of chess is the ancient Indian Prime Minister Sisa Ban Daryl. When the King asked him what he wanted to be rewarded, he said, Your Majesty, please give me a grain of wheat in the first cell of this chess board, two grains in the second cell, and the third cell give four, and as it go on, each cell is doubled from the previous one, until the board is full. The king said, You want so little. Okay, I'll give it to you. But the king then saw that even if he took all India's food, he could not fulfill his promise. The total number of required grains is:

1+2+4+8+16+……263

=264-1

=18,446,744,073,709,551,615

If you build a warehouse for these wheat, the warehouse is 2 meters high and 4 meters wide, the length of the warehouse is 150,000,000 kilometers, which is equal to the distance from the earth to the sun. This is a sudden change.

The computing power of computers is constantly being doubled, and it will not take a long time for sudden change to occur, thus making the level of AI hundreds of millions of times of human being.

3) Quantum Computing can increase the calculation speed by hundreds of millions of times;

4) Reversible calculations make it possible to make large asteroid-like computers;

5) Nanotechnology allows people to arbitrarily assemble molecules and atoms, uses junk as raw materials to breed numerous robots, and can also work with bio- engineering to solve the human brain's way of thinking;

6) Fermi technology is a nuclear and quark class project, and will inevitably bring about unlimited possibility for the increase in calculation speed.1 

After reviewing these technologies, Garis came to a conclusion: 50 or 100 years later, human beings will have no control over AI, so there may be a huge crisis. AI may exterminate human beings for reasons beyond our under- standing.

Faced with this danger, some scientists advocate stopping the study of